Initial geologic studies were conducted in 1938

Initial geologic studies were conducted in 1938.Through the years the area has been the subject of multiple geologic andgeophysical studies. Wildcat and exploration drilling was carried out in thearea, and drilling for structural information was done in 1958 and 1972.Although the adjacent area has a 30-year history of oil production, theKrasnoarmeisky-2 licensed area has not seen production. Well correlationanalysis of wells drilled on the licensed area with wells drilled on adjacent ornearby properties identified stratigraphic units that are correlative withproductive horizons elsewhere in the area, but there is no evidence that thesewere examined or tested during drilling for structural information in previousyears. The Company has begun to acquire and remodel existing geophysicalinformation for the Krasnoarmeisky-2 licensed area and to conduct additional 2-Dseismic studies and expects to be able to define potential new drill targets onthe property About Crown Oil and Gas Inc.Crown Oil and Gas Inc. is an independent oil and gas company focused onenhancing shareholder value by acquiring, exploring, and developing oil and gasassets in Russia. The Company is active in the Saratov region of southernRussia, near the Kazakhstan border.

HOUSTON–(Business Wire)–Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (NYSE: BWP) today declared a quarterly cashdistribution per common unit of $0.485 payable on May 11, 2009, to unitholdersof record as of May 4, 2009. Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP is a limited partnership engaged through itssubsidiaries, Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company, LLC, Gulf South Pipeline Company,LP and Texas Gas Transmission, LLC, in the interstate transportation and storageof natural gas. Boardwalk’s interstate natural gas pipeline systems haveapproximately 14,200 miles of pipeline and underground storage fields havingaggregate working gas capacity of approximately 160 Bcf.Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, HoustonJamie Buskill, 713-479-8082Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerorAllison McLean, 866-913-2122Investor Relations Copyright Business Wire 2009. 1. Sohail Tanvir (Pakistan/Rajasthan Royals)Tanvir has undoubtedly been the best bowler in the DLF Indian Premier League so far.

Sohail Tanvir has picked up 21 wickets from nine games and is the League’s highest wicket taker Needless to say, Rajasthan have found a real gem. 2. Shane Warne (Australia/Rajasthan Royals)Warne is both the captain and the coach of the Royals, and alongside Tanvir has played a pivotal role in the success that Rajasthan have enjoyed. He has brought all his experience to good use, taking 17 wickets in 13 games. 3 S. Sreesanth (India/Kings XI Punjab)Sreesanth has been the silentassassin for the Kings ever since being slapped by Harbhajan The fiery pacer has 19 wickets from 14 games. 4. Irfan Pathan (India/Kings XI Punjab)Irfan Pathan has answered his critics in some style. He has shown remarkable control, especially toward the end of the innings Pathan has 14 wickets from 13 games. 5. Manpreet Gony (India/Chennai Super Kings) Gony, who has yet to appear for India, has been a surprise package in the IPL.

He has been remarkably consistent, using his height very well to pick up early wickets Gony has 14 wickets from 14 games. 6. Umar Gul (Pakistan/Kolkata Knight Riders)Umar Gul has also been a prominent member of the Knight Riders. Gul has shown he has the ability to bowl toward the end of the innings and pick up wickets Gul has 12 wickets from only six games.             . It’s a debate that is being held by every major sport. Should we or should we not implement instant replay? Personally, I think this year in sports is about as PERFECT of a case as to why instant replay works. The NCAA, NHL, NFL, MLB, and now NBA have all had some argument as to why a replay system would work.

For the NCAA, it was in the National Championship game between Memphis and Kansas that showed a three-pointer, wasn’t a three at all, but a two. In the NHL series between Dallas and Detroit, the expanding of the instant replay rule would have helped Detroit with a disallowed goal, and in the same game disallowed a Dallas goal for the same infraction. In football, it’s obvious.  The replay has helped determine touchdowns and most importantly, “Immaculate Receptions” on helmets. Major League Baseball had its first encounter with why this works when the umps botched a homerun call that was off of the foul pole. Now we have the NBA jumping on the bandwagon with their botched call that replay would have solved. All of these scenarios are PROOF that replay would be a great addition to the sports. So what’s the argument? It’s whiny people who think it may make a game longer, and “loyalists” who want the game to stay the same.  That basically means that those people don’t want to be there any longer than they must.